Super-talls and their historic neighbors have helped shape the iconic urban silhouette we associate with the city today. “Except for museum-building, which carries an aura of prestige, few hotshot architects are concentrating on anything else.” In New York City, those hotshots include Adrian Smith and Gordon Gill, James von Klemperer of Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates, and SHoP Architects, many of whom have created towers for the city’s now notorious Billionaire’s Row on 57th Street. a man picks up a piece or element of the game, tries to build a tower, to succeed. The structure has earned the nickname Jenga Building because it looks like the block-stacking game (cantilever bulges jut out on all four sides). But that’s the whole point of the illusion. “The mixed-use, sky-high super-tall is the building typology of the twenty-first century,” writes Nash in Sky-High. a pile of scattered wooden blocks on a blue background. From the outside, 56 Leonard, a 60-story residential building situated in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood, looks like it might tumble. But they are also highly visible markers of exorbitant wealth, the power of real estate, and architectural innovation. These pencil-thin towers are new points of interest in the built landscape. Though Chicago may have invented the skyscraper, New York made it famous, and then took it to its extreme with the advent of the super-tall. Nash, author of forthcoming book Sky-High: A Critique of NYC’s Supertall Towers from Top to Bottom (Princeton Architectural Press, $40)-perhaps some hopeful architectural lasts. The Big Apple is known for its many impressive architectural firsts and-in the opinion of critic Eric P. When it comes to recognizable skylines, New York City’s tops the list. JENGA (BUILDING CONSULTANTS) LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts.
0 Comments
Mohammad Yunus makes this point in describing his book Banker To The Poor: ‘Bangladesh is a land of natural disasters, so this is unfortunately an important factor in our doing business here.’ If you are regularly beset by monsoons, floods and landslides, like Bangladesh or the Philippines, things are going to be harder for you. Some countries are more stable than others. No natural resource is a license to print money, and there are plenty of poor countries who are rich in resources, but it is a factor.įinally, environmental stability can be a factor in development. The Earth Policy Institute describes the American Great Plains as ‘the Saudi Arabia of wind energy’, while sunshine-rich places like California, Sicily and Portugal are able to invest in solar power. These are renewables that need no management, wind, tide and solar resources. Much South American development has been based on the Amazon rainforest, in natural rubber and then timber.įinally, there are what are sometimes called ‘flow resources’. These are all non-renewable resources – once they’re gone, they’re gone, but while stocks last there is wealth to be made.īesides these there are renewable resources – forests, fish, stocks that, if correctly managed, will refresh themselves. Among other advantages, gold and diamonds have helped South Africa build the most successful economy on the continent. Nobody is any doubt about how Saudi Arabia or UAE make their money. It takes infrastructure to capitalise on these, but some places have a distinct advantage over others. Thirdly, every country has been dealt a hand in natural resources. Other countries, like Ethiopia or Lesotho, are not only landlocked, but mountainous as well, making trade even more expensive. Countries like Afghanistan, Rwanda, Malawi, or Bolivia are all hindered by access to ports. And what if your neighbours don’t like you? Ice-bound on its northern coastlines, Russian has squabbled for centuries over access to a warm water port, the Crimean War being the most serious. If you have no access to the coast, not only do you miss out on these services, you have to transport everything by land, which is much more expensive. With ports you can raise money through tolls and shipping services. There are notable exceptions, the medieval Mongol empire was based on the Silk Road from China to the west, but Jeffrey Sachs sums it up well in his important book The End of Poverty: ‘Many of the world’s poorest countries are severely hindered because they are landlocked situated in high mountain ranges or lack navigable rivers, long coastlines, or good natural harbours.’Ĭhina has three of the world’s busiest ports, and so does the US. All the great empires have been based around trade routes, and these are almost always maritime. Secondly, geographical location plays a part in access to markets. Some countries are just at a natural disadvantage. Rain patterns may give you a short growing season, while others can get two harvests in one year. It may be too hot to work between 11 and 2, so you lose three hours out of every day. You have to work twice as hard to get enough to eat out of the ground, you have to irrigate where others can depend on rainfall. In extremes of climate, either hot or cold, too much energy goes into the simple business of survival for there to be much leftover energy for development. Conversely, Europe and North America profit from huge tracts of very fertile land, a temperate climate, and good rainfall. It’s no coincidence that the poorest countries are in the tropics, where it is hot, the land is less fertile, water is more scarce, where diseases flourish. One of the most important factors in development is geography, where the country is in the world, and climate. This is part 2 in a series on why some countries remain poor. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |